Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Religion
    • Travel
    • Environment
Visit gecko85's column >>

GECKO85

Articles Posted: 16  Links Seeded: 289
Member Since: 11/2005  Last Seen: 3/16/2010

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Newsvine Tools
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site
{"contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"tcervo"}

All Songs in iTunes Music Store to be DRM Free

News Type: Event — Tue Jan 6, 2009 1:32 PM EST
technology, music, apple, iphone, ipod, itunes, drm, labels
gecko85
advertisement

Apple just announced that by the end of Q1 2009, all 10 million+ songs in the iTunes music store will be DRM free. (Starting today, 8 million will be DRM free.) Plus there will be a new pricing structure beginning in April, with songs selling for $0.69, $0.99, or $1.29.

Related Articles
iTunes is going to be DRM-Free, but not free of DRM.JustinPMTue Jan 60Comments
Apple changes its iTunes feesWall Street JournalTue Jan 60Comments
Apple cuts copy protection and prices on iTunesAssociated PressTue Jan 650Comments
{"contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"tcervo"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • gecko85's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Tunes
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (7)
{"commentId":4686311,"authorDomain":"tcervo"}
gecko85

This is huge news. Steve Jobs has been saying for a long time he'd like to do away with DRM, but the labels were balking. One of the sticking points was price. Looks like Apple conceded, allowing a higher than $0.99 price, but also getting the labels to agree to a lower price-point as well. My guess is that back catalog stuff will be mostly $0.69, most tracks staying at $0.99, with the newest releases at $1.29? Hard to say.

{"commentId":4686311,"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"tcervo"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 1:34 PM EST
{"commentId":4689363,"authorDomain":"tcervo"}
gecko85

Ok, we now have more information:

  • All 10 millions songs will be DRM-free and at the higher 256kbps bitrate previously used only for iTunes Plus tracks.
  • $0.69 for back catalog tracks.
  • $1.29 for new releases and exclusive tracks.
{"commentId":4689363,"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"tcervo"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 4:05 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":4692395,"authorDomain":"eriqalan"}
eriq samson

Gecko - I am amazed by the people who kept claiming it was Apple's fault for DRM - Apple was doing what they could with the music Industry. Amazon was able to parley their other businesses (selling CD's, etc.) into enough muscle to get DRM free - which gave Apple a way to negotiate the same (even if it meant accepting higher prices for music sold

{"commentId":4692395,"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"eriqalan"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 7:14 PM EST
{"commentId":4693505,"authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
FDBryant3

That is an interesting spin on it. My impression though has been that it was Apple holding things up - specifically over the pricing arrangement (not sure if Apple ever cared about the DRM, although I imagine they did since it locked the music to their player which is where they make their money, and yes I know what Steve said, but quite frankly the actions did not match the words).

The labels have been playing hard ball with Apple for a while now by allowing many other sources to sell DRM free music (Wal-mart, Amazon, Napster, gBox, etc). Music they sold at varying price points. Meanwhile Apple was stuck selling either DRM'd music or DRM free music at a higher price. I think Apple figured out they were losing this battle and that it could become a problem from their money maker - selling iPods, so they caved and gave the labels what they wanted.

{"commentId":4693505,"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 8:46 PM EST
{"commentId":4693684,"authorDomain":"tcervo"}
gecko85

Apple never wanted the DRM. The labels initially demanded it. The labels *really* didn't want anything to do with online sales. But, when the iTunes Music Store took off and the labels realized it was a viable model, they also realized their deal with Apple wasn't very good. They tried to force Apple to make changes (variable pricing, for one.) Apple pushed back, saying they wanted an end to DRM. In an effort to put pressure back on Apple, the labels started signing non-DRM deals with other distributors (like Amazon,) but refused the same deals to Apple unless they re-negotiate. (EMI being the exception...they gave Apple DRM free music.) In this latest deal, I think both sides gave a little.

{"commentId":4693684,"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"tcervo"}
  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 9:07 PM EST
{"commentId":4694441,"authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
FDBryant3

Apple never wanted the DRM.

Personally, I've never believed that particular line from Apple.  The fact is DRM served Apple's purposes (selling iPods) as much as it served the music industries.  All reports seem to agree that Apple actually makes very little profit off of iTunes and that the real profit center is selling iPods.  DRM protected that profit center by making sure that when someone broke or lost their iPod they wouldn't even think of buying a different player because that meant they would lose their music.

If Apple was as anti-DRM as they claimed they would have licensed FairPlay so that practically any player could play their music - of course though this doesn't help them sell iPods.  Now I know they claim they couldn't do this because they couldn't control who has access and pirates could get it and break.  The problem with that argument is that pirates broke it anyway (not to mention the easy burn to CD/rip it hole).

In my opinion I think this is a case of Apple losing the battle to win the war (or at least maintain an advantage).  The single price point was an iPod selling point for the iPod.  However times have changed and DRM has become a liability on the verge of threatening Apple's ability to sell iPods (ie consumers are becoming aware that iTunes limits them and there are other options out there).  Since Amazon and company market share is growing the single price point is at best no longer a selling point, at worst another negative.  So, Apple has sacrificed it and gotten rid of DRM thus protecting reputation and their ability to sell iPods.

{"commentId":4694441,"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
  • 1 vote
#2.3 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 10:11 PM EST
{"commentId":4705366,"authorDomain":"eriqalan"}
eriq samson

Oooooh! Conspiracy Theories! Oooooh!

{"commentId":4705366,"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927","authorDomain":"eriqalan"}
  • 1 vote
#2.4 - Wed Jan 7, 2009 4:23 PM EST
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"462279","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"462279","contentId":"2279927"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking
Back To Top | Front Page
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
  • Newsvine Tools
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2010 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com